Operate the Real Arm · xArm 850 · Step 9 of 9

Operating Report

Use these headings for the short report you write after a supervised run. Where this page gives the arm's readings from one day, check them against what your own screens show, and write down yours.

Task Performed

The approved production task is IntelliMake's laser engraver run¹. The 850's part in it is to move each card from the staging table, S3, on to the engraver's conveyor, S4²³.

Write which existing program or recording you ran, and what it did.

Materials and Equipment

The xArm 850 arm and its control box, with its emergency stop on the box⁴⁵.
Its suction tool, which uses a single suction aperture⁶.
The workpiece: a business card⁷.
A computer with the UFACTORY Studio desktop app, connected by Ethernet to the control box⁸⁹.

Operating Parameters Observed

The 850's readings in Studio on 2026-10-22, for comparison with yours¹⁰:

Parameter	Reading
Firmware and Studio	2.8.2, after that day's update¹⁰
State and mode, arm stopped	Stop, Position¹¹
Mounting	Floor¹¹
TCP preset	Vacuum Gripper: 0.61 kg, tool point 126 mm from the flange¹²
Live Control speed slider	12 %, read on Studio 2.6.0 before the update¹³
Safety boundary and reduced mode	Boundary on but far outside the arm's reach; reduced mode off¹⁴
Speed limits	TCP 1000 mm/s; joints 180 °/s¹⁴
Collision detection	On, sensitivity 3; rebound and self-collision detection on¹⁵
Controller inputs	None set to a safety function¹⁶

Add the readings from your own run: the state and mode while it ran, the speed you used, and anything that changed.

Results Obtained

Write whether the run produced the intended movement, how many cards you moved, and how the run ended.

Problems Encountered

Write each problem: what you saw, what you did first, its cause, and how the arm was recovered. Use the columns of the abnormal-conditions table. If you paused a program, write how you resumed it and what the arm did.

Lessons Learned

Write what you would do differently next time, and what surprised you.

Recommended Improvements to the Procedure

Questions a run can answer: which of Live Control's two vacuum buttons, OPEN or CLOSE, grips¹³, and how a paused program resumes¹⁷.

Add any step of this procedure that was unclear, missing or wrong at the arm.

Printed from https://www.anotherplace.com/learn/en/xarm-850/operate/report. Every line cites its source on that page.

Provenance

References · 17

Each number in the text points here. Every entry states its confidence class in words and keeps its evidence one click away. How to read the labels.

Key to the badges

Confidence: Verified: A manufacturer or IntelliMake document says so, the project owner stated it as the design, or it was observed directly. It does not mean anyone measured it at S2.
Confidence: Inferred: Reasoned from Verified facts. The reasoning is printed with the record.
Confidence: Assumed: Plausible but untested. The record says how it would be checked.
Kind: Gap: Not known. No figure or answer is given in its place.
Kind: Contradiction: Sources disagree. Both sides are shown, and the site does not pick one silently.
Kind: Recommendation: Project advice drawn from the records it cites. Not a fact about the machine and not a confidence class, so the filter never hides it.
Awaiting cell access: Awaiting cell access: could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
This project's simulation and agent design, not the physical cell: This project's simulation and agent design, not the physical cell.

Confidence: Verifiedint-606
The record says
The approved production task for operating the cell's arms is IntelliMake's: the laser engraver run, with the 3D printer planned (stated 2026-10-23). The cell's layout is still being worked out.
Reasoning: Verified as a statement of the cell's design (S236). It names the task, not a procedure: no record yet gives the engraver run's steps, and the layout is not final.
Evidence · 2 citations
Approved production task = Intellimake, so in this case, specific to the engraver printing and planned 3d printer
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S236 (2026-10-23), answer 2
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
although we are still looking at some of the fluid layout issues and workarounds
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S236, answer 2, continued
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: Verifiedint-081
The record says
S2's route for a part is from S1 to S3, and from S3 to S4: S2 always arranges parts on S3 first, then later moves them from S3 on to S4.
Evidence · 2 citations
S1 to S3, and S3 to S4
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S146 (2026-10-07), answer (2)
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
S2 always arranges on S3 first, then later moves parts from S3 to S4.
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S146 (2026-10-07), the option answer (2) matches
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: Verifiedint-007
The record says
S4, the Laser Engraver Conveyor, transfers workpieces through the laser processing area.
Evidence · 1 citation
Transfers workplaces through the laser processing area.
IntelliMake Phase 1 Factory: Autonomous Production Demonstrator (infographic) · IntelliMake.org · S4 station description (the diagram prints 'workplaces'; read as workpieces)
© IntelliMake.org. Used with permission; redrawn for this platform. · Cleared for use by its owner · retrieved 2026-09-21
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: Verifiedcomp-002
The record says
The online hardware manual lists the 850's hardware composition as the robotic arm, an AC controller, a DC controller, the 850 power and signal cable, a mounting tool, and end effectors (Gripper, Vacuum Gripper, BIO Gripper G2, FT Sensor).
Evidence · 1 citation
UFACTORY 850 Robotic Arm AC Controller DC Controller 850 Power and Signal cable Mounting Tool End Effector(Gripper, Vacuum Gripper, BIO Gripper G2, FT Sensor)
UFACTORY 850 Hardware Manual (online), 2. Hardware Installation · UFACTORY · 2.1.1 Hardware Composition (docs site 'UFACTORY 850 硬件手册', English version; names the machine 'UFACTORY 850')
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-09-21
Open the source
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accesssafety-204
The record says
The xArm 850's emergency stop is the red button on its control box, and nothing else is wired into the box's emergency-stop input (as reported from the lab on 2026-10-22). The cell's stations run from a distributed power system that can cut all power, rather than a shared emergency-stop circuit.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified for what the dated report from the lab says (S230, S232), as of 2026-10-22, with the photo of the control box. It says where the button is and what is wired; it is not a test that the stop works, which stays unconfirmed until a test is on record. No inspection of the wiring is recorded.
Evidence · 3 citations
The estop is on the control box
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S230 (2026-10-22)
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
Currently nothing else is wired into the estop input, and the stations run from a distributed power management system, so not a shared circuit per se, but all pwoer could be cut off if needed
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S232 (2026-10-22)
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
a red mushroom emergency-stop button on a yellow ring marked "STOP" on the top face
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Control-box photo
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessint-064
The record says
The xArm 850 at S2 uses a single suction aperture as its attachment.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Evidence · 1 citation
850 uses a single suction apperture as its attachment
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S90
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessint-052
The record says
The business card is the workpiece in both the physical cell and simulation: in the physical cell the cards are produced with a laser engraver, and in simulation the card is a prop object that can be selected.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Evidence · 1 citation
Both, in physical we are producing cards using a laser engraver, in simulation this is a prop object that can be selected.
xArm 850 S2 Project: Open Questions for IntelliMake, Batch 01 responses · IntelliMake.org · Question 1, Answer column
© IntelliMake.org. Used with permission. · Cleared for use by its owner · retrieved 2026-09-29
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessops-217
The record says
Asked whether the lab opens UFACTORY Studio in a web browser or with the desktop app, the answer given on 2026-10-23 was the desktop app, and that learners should download it.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a dated report of how Studio is opened in the lab, as of 2026-10-23 and no further. The question was about the lab, where the xArm 850 is operated from Studio (int-089); the answer names no arm. It names no Studio version and no computer, and no inspection is recorded. It says that the lab uses the desktop app and that learners should download it; it says nothing about whether the browser route UFACTORY's Studio manual describes works.
Evidence · 1 citation
2 desktop app, so they should download it if that was not explicitily said
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S244 (2026-10-23), answer 2, to whether the lab opens UFACTORY Studio in a browser or with the desktop app
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: Verifiediface-037
The record says
UFACTORY recommends connecting the control box directly to the PC by Ethernet cable; a router, a network switch, or a wireless link to a router are the other options.
Evidence · 2 citations
1. The control box is directly connected to the PC(**Recommended connection method**).
UFACTORY 850 Hardware Manual (online), 2. Hardware Installation · UFACTORY · 2.2.3.3 Controller Networking, option 1
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-09-21
Open the source
There are four ways of network settings for the robotic arm.
UFACTORY 850 Hardware Manual (online), 2. Hardware Installation · UFACTORY · 2.2.3.3 Controller Networking
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-09-21
Open the source
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessint-608
The record says
On 2026-10-22 the xArm 850's controller at S2 ran firmware 2.8.2, and UFACTORY Studio read 2.8.2, after they were updated that day (they read 2.6.0 earlier that day and on 2026-10-16).
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of the xArm 850's controller on 2026-10-22: a screenshot of UFACTORY Studio's Device Info page connected to the real arm ('Real' selected, Robot Model 850), described in the observations file. It is what the controller reported that day and no further. No inspection of the arm itself is recorded.
Evidence · 3 citations
Firmware Version | 2.8.2 (was 2.6.0 on 10-16 and earlier on 10-22)
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Device Info after the update, table, 'Firmware Version' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Studio Version | 2.8.2 (was 2.6.0)
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Device Info after the update, table, 'Studio Version' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
I did a firmware update
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow · Statement S223 (2026-10-22), sent with the Device Info screenshot
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessops-211
The record says
On 2026-10-22, on firmware 2.8.2, UFACTORY Studio's status panel for the xArm 850 read State Stop, Mode Position, Payload 0.61 kg and Mounting Floor, with the tool point's X, Y, Z, roll, pitch and yaw and the six joint angles beside them.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of the xArm 850's controller on 2026-10-22, on screens connected to the real arm. The pose figures describe where the arm stood when each screenshot was taken, not a position of the cell.
Evidence · 4 citations
State, Mode | Stop, Position
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Device Info after the update, table, 'State, Mode' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Payload, Mounting | 0.61 Kg, Floor
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Device Info after the update, table, 'Payload, Mounting' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Tool point X, Y, Z | 238.4, 7.4, 137.5 mm
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Status panel table (2.6.0), the rows listed
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
the pose is where the arm stood when the screenshot was taken
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · 'Not a measurement of the cell'
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessops-210
The record says
On 2026-10-22, on firmware 2.8.2, the xArm 850's controller held the TCP preset Vacuum Gripper: a payload of 0.61 kg with its center of gravity 53 mm along z, and a tool point 126 mm along z from the flange, with no other offset or rotation. These are the settings someone entered, not a measurement of the tool.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of the xArm 850's controller on 2026-10-22 (Studio's TCP page, 'Real' selected, firmware 2.8.2). The figures equal UFACTORY's Vacuum Gripper preset (ops-092). Nothing was weighed or measured; no inspection of the tool is recorded.
Evidence · 5 citations
Preset selected | Vacuum Gripper
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · TCP after the update, table, 'Preset selected' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Weight 0.61 kg; centre of gravity CX 0, CY 0, CZ 53 mm
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · TCP after the update, table, 'Payload' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
X 0, Y 0, Z 126 mm
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · TCP after the update, table, 'Offset' row, first part
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Roll 0°, Pitch 0°, Yaw 0°
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · TCP after the update, table, 'Offset' row, after the tool point
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
that the preset's figures match the physical tool (a controller setting is what someone entered, not a measurement)
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · TCP after the update, 'Not settled'
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accessops-209
The record says
On 2026-10-22 (Studio 2.6.0, before the update) UFACTORY Studio's Live Control for the xArm 850 had the Vacuum Gripper selected as its end effector, with OPEN and CLOSE buttons; its speed slider was at 12 % and Manual Mode was off.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of UFACTORY Studio connected to the real xArm 850 ('Real' selected) on 2026-10-22, before the firmware update that day (int-608). It is what the screen showed that day and no further: a slider position and a selected preset can be changed at any time. No inspection of the tool is recorded.
Evidence · 4 citations
End effector selected | Vacuum Gripper (OPEN / CLOSE buttons)
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Live Control table, 'End effector selected' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Speed slider | 12 %
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Live Control table, 'Speed slider' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Manual Mode | Off
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Live Control table, 'Manual Mode' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Firmware Version 2.6.0; Software Version 2.6.0
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Live Control table, 'Product Information' row
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accesssafety-201
The record says
On 2026-10-22, on firmware 2.8.2, the xArm 850's Safety page had the safety boundary on but set far outside any reach (X −3000 to 9999 mm, Y −9999 to 9999 mm, Z −3000 to 9999 mm), so in effect no boundary; reduced mode off; a TCP speed limit of 1000 mm/s and a joint speed limit of 180 °/s.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of the xArm 850's controller on 2026-10-22 (Studio's Safety page, 'Real' selected, firmware 2.8.2). A setting read from the screen says nothing about whether it has been tested; no test of the boundary is recorded.
Evidence · 2 citations
Every value is the same as xarm-850-safety.png on 2.6.0: Safety Boundary on, X −3000 to 9999, Y −9999 to 9999, Z −3000 to 9999 mm; Reduced Mode off; TCP Speed Limit 1000 mm/s; Joint Speed Limit 180 °/s
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Safety after the update
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
the 850's safety boundary is on and set far outside any reach (in effect no boundary); reduced mode is off
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · 'What this settles'
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accesssafety-202
The record says
On 2026-10-22, on firmware 2.8.2, the xArm 850 had collision detection on at sensitivity 3, collision rebound on and self-collision detection on, and 'Clear the IO output when the robot is stopped' off for every output.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of the xArm 850's controller on 2026-10-22 (Advanced Settings and Motion Parameters, 'Real' selected, firmware 2.8.2). Settings, not tests: collision detection is not a safeguard (safety-140).
Evidence · 3 citations
Collision detection sensitivity is 3 (with detection, rebound and self-collision on, Advanced Settings above).
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Eight more screens, 'What these settle'
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Configurable Output (CO0–CO7) and Digital Output (DO0–DO7) off
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Advanced Settings table, 'Clear the IO output' row, first part
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Tool Digital Output (TO0–TO4) off
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · Advanced Settings table, 'Clear the IO output' row, second part
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Confidence: VerifiedAwaiting cell accesssafety-203
The record says
On 2026-10-22 no controller input of the xArm 850 was set to a safety function: every input CI0 to CI7 and DI0 to DI7 was a General Input, so no Stop Moving, Safeguard Reset or Reduced Mode input was configured. Whether anything is wired to the terminals is not shown.
Awaiting cell access: this could be confirmed or corrected once the physical S2 cell can be observed.
Reasoning: Verified as a direct reading of Studio's IO Function page for the xArm 850 on 2026-10-22. It shows the configuration, not the wiring.
Evidence · 3 citations
every input CI0–CI7 and DI0–DI7 is set to General Input
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · IO Function
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
No controller input is wired to a safety function in the settings
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · 'What these settle'
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
whether anything is wired to the terminals is not shown
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow · 'What these settle'
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22
Project copy; not published on this site.
Kind: Gapops-206
Not known
UFACTORY's Studio manual does not say how a script is run, paused, resumed or stopped in the Python IDE, nor how a paused Blockly program is resumed: it lists Blockly's Run and Pause buttons and the STOP button, and no Resume.
Related: iface-145 Verified ops-055 Verified ops-057 Verified
Evidence · 3 citations
Python IDE is a Python development integration environment
UFACTORY Studio User Manual (online), 5. Blockly · UFACTORY · 5.4 Python IDE, the whole section (read 2026-10-23, publisher's commit cf19147, unchanged since 2026-10-13; the page names no Studio or firmware version)
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-10-13
Open the source
2. Pause: Pause the Blockly program.
UFACTORY Studio User Manual (online), 5. Blockly · UFACTORY · 5.1 Interface Overview (read 2026-10-23, publisher's commit cf19147)
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-10-13
Open the source
STOP: The robotic arm will stop immediately and clear all cache commands.
UFACTORY Studio User Manual (online), 4. Live Control · UFACTORY · 4.5 Enable & STOP button (read 2026-10-23, publisher's commit cf19147)
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-10-13
Open the source

Sources for This Page

IntelliMake Phase 1 Factory: Autonomous Production Demonstrator (infographic) · IntelliMake.org (IntelliMake)
© IntelliMake.org. Used with permission; redrawn for this platform. · Cleared for use by its owner · retrieved 2026-09-21 · cited by 1 record here · Project copy; not published on this site.
Owner statements from 2026-09-24 onward (verbatim; S40 and later) · Derek Stringfellow (project owner)
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-04 · cited by 6 records here · Project copy; not published on this site.
UFACTORY 850 Hardware Manual (online), 2. Hardware Installation · UFACTORY (manufacturer)
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-09-21 · cited by 2 records here · Open the source
UFACTORY Studio screens and a control-box photo for the xArm 850, 2026-10-22: what they show (OBSERVATIONS.md) · Derek Stringfellow (project owner)
Derek Stringfellow, project record · Project-internal record · retrieved 2026-10-22 · cited by 8 records here · Project copy; not published on this site.
UFACTORY Studio User Manual (online), 4. Live Control · UFACTORY (manufacturer)
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-10-13 · cited by 1 record here · Open the source
UFACTORY Studio User Manual (online), 5. Blockly · UFACTORY (manufacturer)
© UFACTORY · All rights reserved; quoted briefly as evidence · retrieved 2026-10-13 · cited by 1 record here · Open the source
xArm 850 S2 Project: Open Questions for IntelliMake, Batch 01 responses · IntelliMake.org (IntelliMake)
© IntelliMake.org. Used with permission. · Cleared for use by its owner · retrieved 2026-09-29 · cited by 1 record here · Project copy; not published on this site.

All sources and attribution